lstm validation loss not decreasing

There are two features of neural networks that make verification even more important than for other types of machine learning or statistical models. See this Meta thread for a discussion: What's the best way to answer "my neural network doesn't work, please fix" questions? To make sure the existing knowledge is not lost, reduce the set learning rate. Check that the normalized data are really normalized (have a look at their range). What's the channel order for RGB images? Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most. Neural networks are not "off-the-shelf" algorithms in the way that random forest or logistic regression are. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. If the training algorithm is not suitable you should have the same problems even without the validation or dropout. Welcome to DataScience. Where does this (supposedly) Gibson quote come from? Trying to understand how to get this basic Fourier Series, Linear Algebra - Linear transformation question. How Intuit democratizes AI development across teams through reusability. Before combining $f(\mathbf x)$ with several other layers, generate a random target vector $\mathbf y \in \mathbb R^k$. ", As an example, I wanted to learn about LSTM language models, so I decided to make a Twitter bot that writes new tweets in response to other Twitter users. I reduced the batch size from 500 to 50 (just trial and error). At its core, the basic workflow for training a NN/DNN model is more or less always the same: define the NN architecture (how many layers, which kind of layers, the connections among layers, the activation functions, etc.). Accuracy (0-1 loss) is a crappy metric if you have strong class imbalance. What degree of difference does validation and training loss need to have to be called good fit? Do new devs get fired if they can't solve a certain bug? Why this happening and how can I fix it? or bAbI. Selecting a label smoothing factor for seq2seq NMT with a massive imbalanced vocabulary. Keras also allows you to specify a separate validation dataset while fitting your model that can also be evaluated using the same loss and metrics. Scaling the inputs (and certain times, the targets) can dramatically improve the network's training. In my case the initial training set was probably too difficult for the network, so it was not making any progress. The suggestions for randomization tests are really great ways to get at bugged networks. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Neural Network - Estimating Non-linear function, Poor recurrent neural network performance on sequential data. Set up a very small step and train it. Why zero amount transaction outputs are kept in Bitcoin Core chainstate database? When I set up a neural network, I don't hard-code any parameter settings. Double check your input data. This is achieved by including in the training phase simultaneously (i) physical dependencies between. I'm training a neural network but the training loss doesn't decrease. Suppose that the softmax operation was not applied to obtain $\mathbf y$ (as is normally done), and suppose instead that some other operation, called $\delta(\cdot)$, that is also monotonically increasing in the inputs, was applied instead. But the validation loss starts with very small . If I run your code (unchanged - on a GPU), then the model doesn't seem to train. For example $-0.3\ln(0.99)-0.7\ln(0.01) = 3.2$, so if you're seeing a loss that's bigger than 1, it's likely your model is very skewed. Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers. If this trains correctly on your data, at least you know that there are no glaring issues in the data set. I am so used to thinking about overfitting as a weakness that I never explicitly thought (until you mentioned it) that the. All of these topics are active areas of research. As a simple example, suppose that we are classifying images, and that we expect the output to be the $k$-dimensional vector $\mathbf y = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0\end{bmatrix}$. Do I need a thermal expansion tank if I already have a pressure tank? Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. It means that your step will minimise by a factor of two when $t$ is equal to $m$. I just learned this lesson recently and I think it is interesting to share. (But I don't think anyone fully understands why this is the case.) hidden units). My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project? Does a summoned creature play immediately after being summoned by a ready action? What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? In the Machine Learning Course by Andrew Ng, he suggests running Gradient Checking in the first few iterations to make sure the backpropagation is doing the right thing. I checked and found while I was using LSTM: I simplified the model - instead of 20 layers, I opted for 8 layers. Note that it is not uncommon that when training a RNN, reducing model complexity (by hidden_size, number of layers or word embedding dimension) does not improve overfitting. It takes 10 minutes just for your GPU to initialize your model. Can I tell police to wait and call a lawyer when served with a search warrant? I think I might have misunderstood something here, what do you mean exactly by "the network is not presented with the same examples over and over"? What is going on? Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Minimising the environmental effects of my dyson brain. Tuning configuration choices is not really as simple as saying that one kind of configuration choice (e.g. If a law is new but its interpretation is vague, can the courts directly ask the drafters the intent and official interpretation of their law? The cross-validation loss tracks the training loss. Hey there, I'm just curious as to why this is so common with RNNs. Why do we use ReLU in neural networks and how do we use it? As the OP was using Keras, another option to make slightly more sophisticated learning rate updates would be to use a callback like. For programmers (or at least data scientists) the expression could be re-phrased as "All coding is debugging.". In theory then, using Docker along with the same GPU as on your training system should then produce the same results. Ok, rereading your code I can obviously see that you are correct; I will edit my answer. This can help make sure that inputs/outputs are properly normalized in each layer. The experiments show that significant improvements in generalization can be achieved. 1) Train your model on a single data point. By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. Why is it hard to train deep neural networks? As you commented, this in not the case here, you generate the data only once. This is called unit testing. Setting the learning rate too large will cause the optimization to diverge, because you will leap from one side of the "canyon" to the other. The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learning, Closing the Generalization Gap of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Training Deep Neural Networks. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? If your model is unable to overfit a few data points, then either it's too small (which is unlikely in today's age),or something is wrong in its structure or the learning algorithm. For example, it's widely observed that layer normalization and dropout are difficult to use together. The lstm_size can be adjusted . In particular, you should reach the random chance loss on the test set. I am training a LSTM model to do question answering, i.e. While this is highly dependent on the availability of data. Be advised that validation, as it is calculated at the end of each epoch, uses the "best" machine trained in that epoch (that is, the last one, but if constant improvement is the case then the last weights should yield the best results - at least for training loss, if not for validation), while the train loss is calculated as an average of the performance per each epoch. It's interesting how many of your comments are similar to comments I have made (or have seen others make) in relation to debugging estimation of parameters or predictions for complex models with MCMC sampling schemes. Neural networks and other forms of ML are "so hot right now". My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project? The challenges of training neural networks are well-known (see: Why is it hard to train deep neural networks?). We can then generate a similar target to aim for, rather than a random one. Before checking that the entire neural network can overfit on a training example, as the other answers suggest, it would be a good idea to first check that each layer, or group of layers, can overfit on specific targets. What Is the Difference Between 'Man' And 'Son of Man' in Num 23:19? Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. See: Gradient clipping re-scales the norm of the gradient if it's above some threshold. This means that if you have 1000 classes, you should reach an accuracy of 0.1%. Some examples are. These results would suggest practitioners pick up adaptive gradient methods once again for faster training of deep neural networks. My recent lesson is trying to detect if an image contains some hidden information, by stenography tools. In my experience, trying to use scheduling is a lot like regex: it replaces one problem ("How do I get learning to continue after a certain epoch?") Lol. How to match a specific column position till the end of line? My model look like this: And here is the function for each training sample. What should I do when my neural network doesn't learn? This leaves how to close the generalization gap of adaptive gradient methods an open problem. See if you inverted the training set and test set labels, for example (happened to me once -___-), or if you imported the wrong file. As an example, imagine you're using an LSTM to make predictions from time-series data. A lot of times you'll see an initial loss of something ridiculous, like 6.5. Of course, this can be cumbersome. Problem is I do not understand what's going on here. Just as it is not sufficient to have a single tumbler in the right place, neither is it sufficient to have only the architecture, or only the optimizer, set up correctly. I am runnning LSTM for classification task, and my validation loss does not decrease. Designing a better optimizer is very much an active area of research. For instance, you can generate a fake dataset by using the same documents (or explanations you your word) and questions, but for half of the questions, label a wrong answer as correct. 1 2 . I had this issue - while training loss was decreasing, the validation loss was not decreasing. The problem turns out to be the misunderstanding of the batch size and other features that defining an nn.LSTM. Pytorch. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! This will help you make sure that your model structure is correct and that there are no extraneous issues. Additionally, neural networks have a very large number of parameters, which restricts us to solely first-order methods (see: Why is Newton's method not widely used in machine learning?). Thanks a bunch for your insight! MathJax reference. and i used keras framework to build the network, but it seems the NN can't be build up easily. I'll let you decide. This is especially useful for checking that your data is correctly normalized. Aren't my iterations needed to train NN for XOR with MSE < 0.001 too high? I think Sycorax and Alex both provide very good comprehensive answers. The first step when dealing with overfitting is to decrease the complexity of the model. Residual connections can improve deep feed-forward networks. How do you ensure that a red herring doesn't violate Chekhov's gun? my immediate suspect would be the learning rate, try reducing it by several orders of magnitude, you may want to try the default value 1e-3 a few more tweaks that may help you debug your code: - you don't have to initialize the hidden state, it's optional and LSTM will do it internally - calling optimizer.zero_grad () right before loss.backward . The validation loss is similar to the training loss and is calculated from a sum of the errors for each example in the validation set. Finally, the best way to check if you have training set issues is to use another training set. Predictions are more or less ok here. I simplified the model - instead of 20 layers, I opted for 8 layers. Dealing with such a Model: Data Preprocessing: Standardizing and Normalizing the data. And struggled for a long time that the model does not learn. What could cause this? What image preprocessing routines do they use? By clicking Post Your Answer, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy. This is a very active area of research. You can also query layer outputs in keras on a batch of predictions, and then look for layers which have suspiciously skewed activations (either all 0, or all nonzero). Reiterate ad nauseam. Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience. If this doesn't happen, there's a bug in your code. We hypothesize that I had this issue - while training loss was decreasing, the validation loss was not decreasing. Redoing the align environment with a specific formatting. However training as well as validation loss pretty much converge to zero, so I guess we can conclude that the problem is to easy because training and validation data are generated in exactly the same way.